登陆之后做过的考试将会被保存。可在自己的主页中查看考试记录。 登陆

或者您也可以直接 查看答案。

  • 考试
  • 2025-10-14 更新
  • 30 次浏览
  • 0 人收藏

仔细阅读_1

分享

Section C
Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A), B), C) and D). You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.

 

Passage One
Questions 46 to 50 are based on the following passage.

Research in human-vehicle interaction has shown even systems designed to automate driving are far from being error-proof. Recent evidence points to drivers’ limited understanding of what these systems can and cannot do as a contributing factor to system misuse. A recent study tackles the issue of over-trusting drivers and the resulting system misuse from a legal viewpoint. It looks at what the manufacturers of self-driving cars should legally do to ensure that drivers understand how to use the vehicles appropriately.

One solution suggested in the study involves requiring buyers to sign end-user license agreements (EULAs), similar to the terms and conditions that require agreement when using new software products. But this is far from ideal. The agreement may not provide enough information to the driver, leading to confusion about the nature of the requests for agreement and their implications. Further, most end users don’t read EULAs. A 2017 study shows 91 percent of people agree to them without reading. Among young people, 97 percent agree without reviewing the terms.

The issue is that, unlike using a smartphone app, operating a car has serious safety risks, whether the driver is human or software. And human drivers need to consent to take responsibility for the outcomes of the software and hardware.

“Warning fatigue” and distracted driving are also causes for concern. For example, a driver, annoyed after receiving continuous warnings, could decide to just ignore the message. Or, if the message is presented while the vehicle is in motion, it could represent a distraction. Given these limitations and concerns, even if this mode of obtaining consent is to move forward, it likely won’t fully protect automakers from their legal liability should the system malfunction or an accident occur.

Driver training for self-driving vehicles can help ensure that drivers fully understand system capabilities and limitations. This needs to occur beyond the vehicle purchase. Recent evidence shows even relying on the information provided by the seller is not going to answer many questions. All of this considered, the road forward for self-driving cars is not going to be a smooth ride after all.

  • 46
  • 单选题
  • 分值:14.2
问.

What do we learn from research in human-vehicle interaction?

  • 47
  • 单选题
  • 分值:14.2
问.

What is the problem with requiring buyers to sign end-user license agreements?

  • 48
  • 单选题
  • 分值:14.2
问.

What would drivers do when they suffer from “warning fatigue”?

  • 49
  • 单选题
  • 分值:14.2
问.

What does the author think of continuing to ask buyers to sign end-user license agreements?

  • 50
  • 单选题
  • 分值:14.2
问.

What should be done to help drivers fully understand system capabilities and limitations?

captcha

如果喜欢我的内容,可以扫描二维码请我喝咖啡。

作者简介

yinbrew
  • 2.8万 浏览
  • 404 内容

www.yinbrew.com 创造者。